
The fable of the bees
by Bernard Mandeville · first published 1723
7mentions
3recommended by
6HN commenters
2010–2026first – last mentioned
50% recommend50% neutral
Although never censored, Bernard Mandeville's anonymously published The Fable of the Bees; or Private Vices, Public Benefits came to be regarded soon after its publication in 1723 as the Enlightenment's epitome of immorality. As a naturalistic account of the mechanisms that condition human desire and of the unintended stabilizing social consequences of self-interested action, it has since been recognized as one the eighteenth century's most significant works of social theory. More sharply focused on Mandeville's social theory than any previous collection of his writings, this abridged and mod
Affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Read freeProject Gutenberg








…Beautiful - definitely about government, money, society. Economics as if people mattered. When I first read this, I thought the survival of the planet depended on people reading it. I found Mandeville's Fable of the Bees (1729) extremely funny and just as true. How everything depends on the sins of humanity. If we were all virtuous, economies would fall apart etc. Goes in detail into this argument and he's hard to argue…
on “Ask HN: What are some deep, mentality changing books?” ↗For a rebuttal to the critiques of excess found here, I recommend Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees (which Keynes references in the General Theory). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fable_of_the_Bees I do think it's worth contextualizing such debates about vice and virtue in the politics of the time.…
on “Imagining utopia–and condemning excess–during the Enlightenment” ↗> 5. Self-Interest Actually Helps Everyone See perhaps The Fable of the Bees as well, which was published a few years before Smith's birth: > In The Grumbling Hive, Mandeville describes a bee community that thrives until the bees decide to live by honesty and virtue. As they…
on “10 Enduring Lessons from Adam Smith” ↗…edit: Also La Rochefoucauld's Maxims should be very high on a list of exposés - it's a savage exposé of oneself. La Bruyere's Characters is a milder but still at-times-scathing exposé of the world. As is Fable of the Bees.. [0] http://metanoia-films.org/
on “Ask HN: Favorite “Adam Ruins Everything”-esque media? (blogs, podcasts, etc)” ↗Maybe i overread it but The Fable of the Bees is from Bernard Mandeville. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fable_of_the_Bees My two takes for a good historic understanding of economics are this Books: Economics of Good and Evil, Tomáš Sedláček https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Good-Evil-Economic-Gilgames...…
on “Ask HN: What are the must-read books about economics/finance?” ↗…carefully chosen rules. It's inevitable, so there's no much point getting upset about it. Why not turn it to largely positive ends? He wasn't first. Bernard de Mandeville was well ahead of him with The Fable of the Bees. I found Hayek enlightening to read: http://chester.id.au/2012/12/07/review-the-essence-of-hayek-...
on “Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s Eight Books Everyone Should Read” ↗…Evolution" Sam Bowles notes that the customs and economics of open source software have more in common with small-scale societies (99% of human history) than capitalism: The project that began with the "Fable of the Bees may be of even less practical relevance in the future. The reason is that the technologies and social interactions of the modern economy increasingly depart from these canonical assumptions. Direct noncontractual…
on “Utopia's scaffolding: What civilization took from us, I think we will get back.” ↗