Cover of The shaky game

The shaky game

by Arthur Fine · first published 1986

4mentions
1recommended by
2HN commenters
2015–2023first – last mentioned

50% recommend50% neutral

Affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Mentions per year

10 2007: 0 mentions2008: 0 mentions2009: 0 mentions2010: 0 mentions2011: 0 mentions2012: 0 mentions2013: 0 mentions2014: 0 mentions2015: 1 mention2016: 0 mentions2017: 0 mentions2018: 0 mentions2019: 0 mentions2020: 0 mentions2021: 0 mentions2022: 1 mention2023: 1 mention2024: 0 mentions2025: 0 mentions2026: 0 mentions200720172026

What Hacker News says

  • Eupraxias · Aug 15, 2022 · Recommends

    …confident as to make these kinds of career-breaking ontological commitments? The most excellent book I have read on the topic, and I highly recommend this to everyone on this thread: Arthur Fine "The Shaky Game: Einstein's Realism and the Quantum Theory". I would love to hear suggestions for books to read as follow-up to this.

    on “What is quantum field theory and why is it incomplete?” ↗
  • Eupraxias · Jun 25, 2023 · Recommends

    Anyone interested in Einstein's ontological and epistemological beliefs should read Arthur Fine's excellent "The Shaky Game - Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory". One of the most rewarding books I have ever read.

    on “Einstein's Philosophy of Science” ↗
  • orionblastar · Aug 26, 2015 · Mentions

    …when he talks about God it is Spinoza's God: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinozism It is a key to understanding his theories. Einstein argues with quantum theory scientists: http://www.amazon.com/Shaky-Game-Science-Conceptual-Foundati... Black Holes do not destroy matter: http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/black-holes-do-not-destroy-mat... I could be wrong, my citations could be wrong, but this is the way we…

  • Eupraxias · Aug 16, 2022 · Mentions

    …drastic and new approach. I am delighted to see brave physicists making ontological commitments - perhaps they are not aware of the tangled web that awaits them. This is why Fine's book is called "The Shaky Game". Epistemological grounding for claims in physics is... shaky at best. I am not satisfied with Fine's concession - the NOA (natural ontological attitude). I believe that only a drastic solution will resolve…

    on “What is quantum field theory and why is it incomplete?” ↗

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Focus search
j / k
Next / previous book
Enter
Open focused book
Esc
Close / go back
g h
Go to Home
g t
Go to Top all-time
g m
Go to Most recommended
g r
Go to Rising
g f
Go to For You
?
Show this help