Polygraph and Lie DetectionCommittee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences Board on Behavioral, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council
Polygraph and Lie Detection
by Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences Board on Behavioral, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council
2mentions
0recommended by
2HN commenters
2019–2020first – last mentioned
100% neutral
Affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
…review by the National Academy of Sciences of existing research concluded that there was "little basis for the expectation that a polygraph test could have extremely high accuracy." The cited article: The Polygraph and Lie Detection. National Research Council. 2003. ISBN 978-0-309-26392-4. (https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10420/the-polygraph-and-lie-dete...)
on “Accused spy Alexander Yuk Ching Ma evidently beat the polygraph” ↗You can read the National Academy of Sciences' conclusions on the polygraph and lie detection in their paper here - https://www.nap.edu/read/10420/chapter/10
on “Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules” ↗