
Notes from Underground
by Stephen Duncombe · first published 1997
8mentions
4recommended by
7HN commenters
2013–2026first – last mentioned
57% recommend29% neutral14% critical
245 pages ; 23 cm
Affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.




…for "religious arguments" about editors. Instead of belittling such sentiments, you might want to find out why they're so prevalent and whether they are indeed harmful. I suggest you read Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground and Thomas Mann's The Magic Mountain. These books have awarded me a lot of insight on the subject.
on “TechCrunch Pump n Dump” ↗Another excellent book that injects you into an unstable protagonist is Fyodor Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground. Can be read in a day. Highly recommend. This was my first intro to Russian lit.
on “Why did Dostoyevsky write Crime and Punishment?” ↗A few of this year's highlights for me and my notes on the books, where available. Fiction - Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky - https://papertrail.biblish.com/books/2ab29d16-0cb1-4ef8-8cde... Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen - https://papertrail.biblish.com/books/65214629-29ac-45a6-b474... Bleak House…
on “Ask HN: What were the best books you read this year?” ↗If you're looking for examples critical of humanity you have lots of options (mostly from the last two centuries). Notes from Underground and The Death of Ivan Ilyich fit the bill. I reread the former relatively recently (first time since college). It's dark, not for the easily affected.
on “Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans” ↗I wonder how the 'psychological novel' which was supposed to be invented in James' The Portrait of a Lady (1880) (according to the article) is distinct from, e.g., Crime and Punishment (1866) (or Notes from Underground, though I guess that was a novella so it doesn't count). Is Portrait of a Lady more psychologically focused, or is the way it treats the psychological content somehow different?
on “Novels were never the same after Henry James” ↗I found The Plague to be quite enjoyable, while I've struggled through Notes from Underground and The Idiot (the latter moreso because of its length). The Stranger and The Fall by Camus are also incredible, I hope to read all of them in their original French sometime soon.
on ““The Idiot” Savant: On Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Idiot” ↗The first linked article (commentarymagazine.com) suggests that the Garnett/Matlaw translations of Dostoevsky’s "Notes from Underground" is a better translation than the P&V translation. As an example, it says the following: > ...His word for such acts of self-injury is, in English translations before P&V, “spite.” It is fair to say…
on “How Chekhov invented the modern short story” ↗…whom? We certainly wouldn't be the same beings. > I think that we think more clearly and make better decisions at that level. You may be right, but so what? Who says that's better? Dostoyevsky wrote Notes from Underground about that (the protagonist is a man, a very neurotic man, who finds freedom -- or convinces himself so -- only in spite and self-harm). It is we who decide what's meaningful for us, and what we want…
on “On the Value of Not Knowing Everything” ↗