
How we know what isn't so
by Thomas Gilovich · first published 1991
4mentions
3recommended by
4HN commenters
2010–2022first – last mentioned
75% recommend25% neutral
Discusses the processes through which we become convinced of the validity of questionable or false beliefs such as special psychological powers and New Age health practices.
Affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.








…act out in daily life with small variations, interpret others' actions in light of performances they have seen before, and collectively build shared narratives in a 'social construction of reality'. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life by Thomas Gilovich. A grand tour of the fallibility of homo economicus, and reality torturing heuristic shortcuts that lead us astray. Influence: The…
on “Ask HN: Good books?” ↗Here are some nonfiction books that I've enjoyed. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life - Gilovich - a good book on the inability of the human mind to accept things as random. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High…
on “Ask HN: Summer Reading Recommendations?” ↗…Falsely Now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euzoOkBUzsQ List of Cognitive Biases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/... How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life Paperback – March 5, 1993 by Thomas Gilovich Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari Reading most articles from lesswrong.com or slatestarcodex.com Slightly unrelated:…
on “Ask HN: How to start developing critical thinking?” ↗…two-hours/day watching some Netflix movie - this is the same thing. 2) I guess the ones that are based on subjective interpretation instead of objective fact (whatever that is today). There is a book called "How we know what isn't so" (https://www.amazon.com/How-Know-What-Isnt-Fallibility-dp-002...), and it talks a fair amount about humans can clash by developing different interpretations of reality that they think are really real.…
on “Surviving Disillusionment” ↗